Kerr SimpliShade Case Study Universal strategy for different situations Prof. Angelo Putignano

      

• M.D. degree and D.D.S. post graduate certificate from University of Ancona-Italy
• Full professor in Restorative Dentistry at School of Dentistry Polytechnique University of Marchencona Italy
• Head of Operative dentistry and Endodontics department at School of Dentistry Polytechnique University of Marche-Ancona-Italy
• Dean School of Dental Hygienist Polytechnique University of Marche-Ancona-Italy
• Active Member Italian Society
• Founding Member Italian Academy of Esthetic Dentistry (IAED)
• Active Member European Academy of Esthetic Dentistry (EAED)
• Private practice limited to Restorative Dentistry in Ancona, Italy
• He is co- author of the book “Adhesive Dentistry: the Key to success” edited by Quintessence International.
• Co-Author of “Indirect Conservative Restoration of Posterior teeth” (UTET 2008) 
• Prof. Putignano is lecturing internationally on adhesive & aesthetic restorations

Advancements in material science and technology have provided dental professionals with a variety of composite materials that offer simplified solutions for a range of clinical situations. These innovations, combined with refined techniques, have made complex procedures, such as the cementation of indirect restorations, more accessible and less time-consuming. This clinical case highlights the use of composite materials and simplified techniques to effectively address multiple clinical challenges, demonstrating the potential of modern dentistry to improve everyday practice and patient outcomes.

Fig. 1 - Initial situation The initial situation involves an elderly patient with an old amalgam restoration in the lower right posterior region, which the patient wishes to have removed for aesthetic reasons.

Fig. 2 - Rubber dam application After applying the rubber dam, the old restorations were removed, revealing different substrates.

Fig. 3 - Cavity preparations Final aspect of the cavity preparations: Two Class II restorations were completed, and an overlay preparation was performed on the first molar. The fracture line on the mesial wall was left un- touched to prevent further propagation; it will be bonded during the cementation of the indirect restoration.

Fig. 4 - Immediate dentin sealing Immediate dentinal sealing was performed for the build up of the first molar using SimpliShade Bulk Fill Flow (Kerr).Following this, two sectional posterior matrices were placed and se- cured with an orange wedge and a ring for the Class II restorations.

Fig. 5 - Direct restorations. After the adhesive procedures, the direct restorations were completed using a single shade of SimpliShade Bulk Fill (Kerr), followed by characterization with brown stains. Thanks to its easy handling and low shrinkage stress, it was possible to fill both cavities in a single 4 mm increment of composite. The material was then adapted and shaped using the Es- presso posterior lines technique, saving valuable time.

Fig. 6 - Indirect restorations. After completing the direct restorations, digital impressions were captured using the Helios 500 intraoral scanner by Eighteenth. The advantage of a digital workflow is that it enables clinicians to complete the treatment in a single day. In fact, the final indirect restoration was ready for cementation just one hour later.

Fig. 7 - Rubber dam application for the indirect restoration  The rubber dam was applied for the cementation of the indirect restoration after checking the fit of the overlay.

Fig. 8 - Adhesive applications. After that, the adhesive procedure was performed using Optibond Universal (Kerr) following selective enamel etching with phosphoric acid for 20 seconds. The single-component universal adhesive was then rubbed and scrubbed into the surface, applied in two layers. After air-blowing, the universal bonding was polymerized for 40 seconds. The indirect restoration was then cemented using NX3 Universal Adhesive Resin Cement (Kerr). A step luting technique was employed, involving the removal of excess cement prior to polymerization. The excess cement was meticulously removed using the fine tip of the LM-Fissura instrument (LM-Dental).

Fig. 9 - Glycerine application. After removal of the ex- cess, glycerine was applied to prevent surface oxygen inhibition, ensuring complete polymerization of the resin cement.

Fig. 10 - Rubber dam removal. Therefore, the rubber dam was removed to begin the finishing and polishing procedure of the direct and indirect restorations.

Fig. 11 - Occlusal check The occlusion was checked and adjusted as needed.

Fig. 12 - Radiological evaluation. The radiological evaluation (left before and right after) shows the fit of the indirect restoration, with the resin cement completely sealing all margins, without any presence of excess.

Fig. 13 - One week of follow-up. The final appearance after one week of follow-up.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the use of universal adhesive resins and bulk-fill composite materials simplifies dental procedures, allowing clinicians to perform complex treatments in a predictable and efficient manner. These advanced materials not only improve the efficiency of daily practice but also enhance patient satisfaction by reducing the need for multiple visits. Embracing these innovations in modern dentistry can significantly streamline workflows while ensuring high-quality outcomes.

Order Now!

MKT-24-1797 Rev-0 Disclosure: Prof. Angelo Putignano is a consultant for Kerr. The opinions and technique expressed in this article are based on the experience of Prof. Angelo Putignano. Kerr is a medical device manufacturer and does not dispense medical advice. Clinicians should use their own professional judgment in treating their patients. All trademarks and brand names are the property of their respective owners.